Can you still retrieve and explain GxP records from a retired application?
GxP is an umbrella term for regulated Good Practice environments, including Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).
Retiring a GxP application does not end the retention obligations for its records. Your eArchiving approach may need to preserve the records together with relevant metadata, audit trails, signatures, retention information and other context required for later review.
Archive gaps often become visible after system retirement
Shutdown plans usually cover hosting, licences, interfaces and data export.
They may give less attention to how authorised users will retrieve complete records, interpret audit trails or identify the applicable record version after the source application is unavailable.
Those questions are easier to resolve before decommissioning than after the project team has moved on.
What the guide helps you check
The guide helps your team assess whether a GxP eArchiving approach covers the questions that should be resolved before the source application is decommissioned.
For teams preparing, reviewing or recovering from regulated system retirement
Quality and regulatory
QA, Quality Systems, Regulatory Operations, Data Integrity and Records Management teams.
IT quality and validation
IT Quality, CSV/CSA, validation leads and application owners for legacy platforms.
Typical systems
LIMS, ELN, eTMF, QMS, laboratory instruments, clinical trial systems and GxP-relevant workflow platforms.
Identify archive gaps before system shutdown
Use the guide to review whether your GxP eArchiving approach covers retrieval, readability, metadata, audit trails, retention responsibilities and evidence of ingestion. It supports an initial assessment and does not determine GxP compliance. For a broader framework, see the GxP eArchiving Requirements checklist.